Jump to content

Diskussioner kring Star Trek Into Darkness biointäkter runtom i världen


Recommended Posts

Det som är intressant är att Trekmovie hävdar att Paramounts uppskattningar för tre veckor sedan låg på 80-90 miljoner för USA. Sedan ska de ha ökat dem rejält när de flyttade filmens premiär från fredag till torsdag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • It took too long: It’s been four years, which may not sound like a long time, but the first film opened the same summer as the first Hangover, which will complete its trilogy next week. There have also been three films starring Iron Man in the interim. Just saying.
  • They took the fanbase for granted and burned them: The Trek core audience more than likely found out the big spoilers ahead of time and were revolted. Abrams is very public about the fact that he didn’t like Trek to start with, and has moved on to Star Wars. Abrams doesn’t like Klingons, and doesn’t like them for any good reason. Basically, everyone involved did everything they could to piss off the hardcore.
  • They should have sold the villain: Benedict Cumberbatch is not a name player to anyone who doesn’t watch Sherlock. “Oh that guy who was in War Horse for ten minutes?” Unfortunately, Abrams built into the script that who he’s playing is a reveal so he could argue that holding it back would give the audience more pleasure. It seems to have backfired in this case.
  • Different competition: In 2009, X-Men Origins: Wolverine was the first film of the summer, which was heavily pirated before release and generally not very good. The next week offeredStar Trek, which benefited from this situation. In the interim, no one involved has really raised their profile in Hollywood. Zachary Quinto came out of the closet, but that didn’t seem to do much for or against his career. Pre-Star Trek he was that guy from Heroes. Now he’s onAmerican Horror Story. Chris Pine was in a couple of movies like Unstoppable and This Means War, and none of them were hits because of him, nor did he give great performances in either. Zoe Saldana did appear in Avatar, but as a giant blue cat. And — for the most part — the fanboy cast doesn’t like Abrams. They may like his movies, but the fact that he turned Star Trek into Star Wars, and is now leaving Star Trek for Star Wars doesn’t help his case. On top of which, his movies have no real personality. Though the lens flare talk is a bit much, it’s the most distinctive thing about his filmmaking, other than “Energy!”

Ovanstående är vad Screen Crave tror är orsakerna. Hela artikeln från ett par dagar sedan finns här:

http://screencrave.com/2013-05-19/box-office-roundup-star-trek-darkness-wins-weekend-loses-war/

Här kan man följa dag för dag vad filmen spelar in i USA:

http://www.boxoffice.com/statistics/movies/untitled-star-trek-sequel-2012

Problemet är att Fast and Furious 6 ser ut att vara bra från det jag såg från trailern. Den kommer att slå stort.

Officiella siffrorna för dom fyra första dagarna i USA är nu inne. Siffran landade på $83,701,981. Intäkterna utanför USA ligger på $80,500,000, så filmen har hittills spelat in $164,201,981.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=startrek12.htm

Ryssland hamnade inte på 8 miljoner dollar, utan strax över sex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jag tror de fokuserade för mycket på fansen och fick dem att spekulera vem skurken var. De flesta bryr sig inte om det var John Harrison, Khan, Gary Mitchell eller någon annan. Det var ett misstag. De borde fokuserat mer på Kirk och Spock och bara skurken i kontexten att de fajtades mot honom. Nu tog Cumberatchs figur överhanden. Jag tror att man gillade Cumberbatchs rollprestation för mycket, Abrams kärlek för hemligheter samt trodde att alla gillade Star Trek bara för att den förra filmen gick bra. Man hade fått jobba mer med att göra Star Trek coolt igen. Fortsatt med idéen att detta är inte din farsas Star Trek.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kollar på Into Darkness visningar i Göteborg nu på tordag. Bara fem stycken. Antalet dukar minskar också kraftigt. Det är väl därför filmer tappar så mycket intäkter efter ett par veckor. Det finns helt enkelt inte längre tillräckligt med dukar för alla nya filmer som kommer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Glömde visst posta totalsumman för Into Darkness:

Domestic: $228,778,661 48.9%
+ Foreign: $238,602,923 51.1%

= Worldwide: $467,381,584

Jämfört med Star Trek 2009:

Domestic: $257,730,019 66.8%
+ Foreign: $127,950,427 33.2%

= Worldwide: $385,680,446


Sämre i USA men bättre runtom i världen alltså.

Edited by The Holy Three
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...